Relationship Maintenance a Review of Research on Romantic Relationships Pdf

Abstract

Love is a key emotion in people's lives, and also plays a vital role in human health. It is a multifaceted feeling, with different expressions in different life contexts. Its polysemy has been widely identified and analysed upon observing how the different styles of experiencing love take different effects on personal and relational health. This article presents a review of literature regarding the influence of the various love styles—identified by Lee [ane]—on quality and duration of a dear human relationship, and how they may be predictors for the health and well-being of partners. Upon assay of the various reviewed articles, information technology is recorded that the various beloved types and styles take unlike furnishings on various levels of quality and duration of the human relationship between two people. On the basis of the results observed, the authors suggest numerous inquiry priorities in order to facilitate the implementation of knowledge through actions targeted towards relational wellness and well-being.

Share and Cite:

Raffagnino, R. and Puddu, L. (2018) Love Styles in Couple Relationships: A Literature Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 307-330. doi: 10.4236/jss.2018.612027.

1. Introduction

Love, a widely discussed topic in literature and art for centuries, has also become an interesting theme in psychology, equally it is considered an of import emotion in the life of a man. Information technology stimulates people, even in cultures across the Western world, to commit to lasting relationships, such as spousal relationship or cohabitation [2], and this has relevant repercussions on the life and evolution of men and women, who thus ensure a necessary rearing for children and develop their social intelligence and cooperative skills [iii].

Honey is a feeling that is especially expressed by the people involved in romantic relationships and is considered, along with a number of other factors (such as intimacy, commitment, and affection), one of the most significant components for a satisfying relationship [iv] and for its duration [5]. These are aspects that, within the wider telescopic of relationship quality, are related to subjective well-being, specially in terms of happiness, life satisfaction, and the beingness of more than positive by experiences as opposed to negative feelings [4] [6].

On the other hand, love relationships tin can likewise be a source of stress, discomfort, struggle, pain, and negative feelings, particularly when associated with dependence and obsessive behaviour, which may negatively affect the quality and duration of a relationship [7] [8] [ix]. In sure cases, it is recorded how love may also be translated to pathological love (PL) that, although not diagnostically referred to as a clinical disorder, is assimilated in enquiry―fifty-fifty neurophysiology enquiry―to psychopathologies related to substance and behavioural addictions [10].

This expression of love in its healthy and pathological connotation [11] [12] already hints the polysemy of the feeling, which is in any example confirmed by numerous studies that point out the diverse ways and peculiarities of living and expressing it in different human relationship types (friendly, romantic, parental, etc.) and inside the same romantic relationship [13] [14].

Throughout the years, dissimilar classifications of dearest have been hypothesized and are widely present in empirical literature every bit important points of reference for the evolution of psychological cognition in the field. Berscheid and Walster [15] proposed an initial distinction between passionate dear―an intense emotion distinguished past a potent desire to bond with one'due south partner―and companionate dearest, which implies feelings such as affection and tenderness. In literature, nosotros may also find some other kind of dear, called empathetic dearest (CL), a feeling oriented towards care, aid, and worrying for some other, who may even be a partner in a romantic relationship, especially if suffering and needy [16]. Considering the different attitudes people have towards romantic love, Lee [ane] has identified and coded half dozen love styles: 3 are primary and three are secondary. Primary styles include Eros (passionate, romantic love), Ludus (playful love), and Storge (friendly love). Styles considered secondary, existence combinations of 2 chief styles, include: Mania (obsessive or addictive dear), a combination of Eros and Ludus; Pragma (practical, rational dear), a combination of Storge and Ludus; and Agape (donating/unselfish love), including Eros and Storge (in Table 1, we nowadays a brief description of the primary characteristics of each love style). It is one of the most utilized classifications of love, and also the most structured, consummate, and focused on romantic relationships. Information technology is no coincidence that information technology was the basis for the development of a tool chosen the Love Attitude Scale (LAS) [17], which measures the six dear styles and is commonly used in research. It has also been adjusted to dissimilar countries―including Italy [eighteen] ―as a proof of its reliability and validity.

Tabular array 1. Brief clarification of dearest styles.

Some of the components of the six love styles seem to accept common traits with those used in other classifications [19], which nonetheless appear more general and less specific to beloved relationships. For case, the donating attitude of the Agape love style is comparable to the compassionate love blazon, although the former focuses on romantic relationships, whilst the latter is conceived as a love type that may be experimented to attain a broad range of goals, including relationships with a partner, but also with friends, family, strangers, or even humanity as a whole [20]. Neto [21] recorded that compassionate love may exist correlated to four of the vi love styles: positively with Eros and Agape, and negatively with Ludus and Pragma, while he found no link to Storge and Mania. Passionate love has been identified by Acevedo and Aron [7] equally a combined measure of romantic love and obsession, and Graham [9] observed how it shows a correlation to Eros or Mania.

In lodge to understand if and how the various love styles may explain a possible variability in a love relationship and its quality―even with respect to personal and relational well-being―we hither present a literature review that may assist understand what empirical studies have focused on the subject matter. Such review may be useful in defining farther outlets in research and in assessment and preventive praxes related to the wellness and well-existence of partners in a relationship. In fact, acknowledging how―and on which levels―the different styles can influence the human relationship both as take a chance factors and every bit resources may help target the prevention functioning towards crucial details to deed on in gild to promote an improved relational quality.

2. Method

2.1. Procedure

To place and assess the articles relevant to the review, the research group devised some inclusion/exclusion criteria to choose papers relevant for this review. These criteria regard: publications in peer review journals; focus on love styles distinguished past Lee and exclusion of papers that focused on other honey taxonomies; focus on both marital quality/stability and relational dimensions; good quality of the inquiry method and its authentic description in the paper.

In society to identify the studies and enquiry projects relevant to this review, we have used electronic databases such as ScienceDirect, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The most part of the papers were collected from Google Scholar and ScienceDirect. We take considered papers in English and Italian published from 2004 to this day, implementing the meta-analysis proposed by Masuda [22] equally a means of synthesis of the enquiry results. Masuda studied the correlation between relational satisfaction and two love types―passionate and companionate―measured by ways of various tools applied to the most widespread theories. Information technology was thus a more express review―in terms of the variables considered―compared to the one presented in this article, simply that in whatsoever case offered a framework of the land-of-the-art up until the date of its publication, and which supported the difference between Lee's theory and other theoretical models of honey, giving credit to the greater elaboration of the onetime.

The following primal words and cardinal give-and-take combinations take been used for this review: dearest or love fashion and marital quality, marital stability, marital satisfaction, marital well-being and health.

2.2. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

We have included studies and inquiry projects published from 2004 to 2018 that analyse the love style topic, along with variables in the quality and elapsing of the relationship. We take excluded the ones that did not involve love styles and relational aspects in their assay. In any example, in drafting our introduction and word/conclusions we accept also referenced articles analysing the theme of love and its classifications in terms of personal, social, and even health and well-existence characteristics.

Given that our aim is to provide an initial review of scientific literature on the influence of unlike dear styles on the quality and elapsing of the relationship between two people, the inquiry was limited to articles of a high methodological quality. We accept in any instance considered consummate projects published in peer-review journals, and have excluded summaries presented at seminars, reports introduced at conferences, dissertations, and comment articles that provided only partial data and authors' opinions. We too excluded the articles we accept non managed to retrieve, fifty-fifty upon straight request to the authors by e-mail.

2.three. Screening and Material Pick

The articles retrieved have been assessed by two independent reviewers. They were first selected based upon their title and abstract: 1943 articles to be potentially included in this review were identified on this basis. This initial screening likewise included papers dealing with love, love types, and honey styles, even when not assessing the effects on the quality and elapsing of the love human relationship. Upon a second pick based upon the titles and abstracts, we identified 235 manufactures concerning the general topic (love, love types, honey styles) and retrieved their full text. We added a further 60 articles to these, and two reviewers take selected the abstract pool on the basis of the relevance of the topic dealt with to this review, and their methodological quality. This process has narrowed the pool to 122 articles. We successively focused merely on those that concerned dear styles in relation to quality and duration aspects in the love relationship, and for the purposes of the analysis we identified a sample of 22 manufactures (Figure 1).

Each of the 22 manufactures was analysed in depth, in an attempt to place the theoretical basis, the goal and hypotheses, the inquiry design, the procedure and tools utilized, as well as the main results recorded, using a specific, detailed method. In terms of systems and literature research, we have assessed the objectives, methods, and results obtained. As for the results, every publication has been summarized and classified in accordance with the six dearest styles described in Lee's theory of love [1]. The method has been accounted by the researchers the almost straightforward for a facilitated recognition of the effects of each love manner on relational health and well-being. Throughout such stage, some doubts and perplexities about the inclusion of papers and their methodological quality were discussed between the two researchers, occasionally through the involvement of a third researcher.

3. Results

The 22 articles considered in the scope of the review were all published on peer-review international journals; they are for the most part empirical researches, and iii meta-analyses were also consulted. An article by Acevedo and Aron [7] includes, along with a meta-assay, fifty-fifty a literature review that we take non considered in our assessment, in that information technology deals with a more than general topic than the i in concern. The manufactures focus on the correlation between and influence of the various love styles on the different variables affecting relational quality, some of which are considered in the aforementioned enquiry pattern. Depending on the situations, the relational dimensions are analysed in combination with different variables (also regarding―along with socio-personal and cultural characteristics―well-being, wellness, psychopathology and family history), and dearest styles are considered mediation variables. While generally the effects of dear styles on marital quality and stability are analyzed using an individual approach, Gana et al. [23] adopted a dyadic approach and the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. This choice permitted them to know not only how the dearest style of one member bear upon his/her marital quality perception (actor effect), but also the partner's one.

A widely shared denominator or precondition to the goals formulated in the different research projects analysed in our review is the centrality of love in the construction and maintenance of relational quality, which is oftentimes linked to theories of love and relationships. An additional recurring common denominator in the assessed papers is the recording of both the contradiction betwixt studies on love and the lack of knowledge on relevant topics.

iii.1. Methodological Characteristics of the Reviewed Enquiry Papers

In terms of methodological characteristics, we shall make a stardom betwixt reviews and empirical research, in that nosotros take adopted different method cess criteria for each. For the reviews, we take identified the type, inclusion/exclusion criteria, the number of studies considered by the authors, and the reference population. As for the empirical research projects, nosotros have assessed the method on the basis of the characteristics and origin of the sample, the type of sample, the setting, the procedure, the independent and dependent variables, and the tools used. We take identified two reviews, 1 by Acevedo and Aron [7] and i by Graham [9], both conducting a meta-analysis of the research projects assessed. Acevedo and Aron [7] conducted a meta-analysis of 25 researches and studies satisfying specific inclusion/exclusion criteria, including: duration of the relationship; focus on relational satisfaction (dependent variable) and love styles; romantic, obsessive, and companionate love; dimensions such equally passion and intimacy (independent variables). Graham [9] selected 81 studies, which were required to: be in English language; employ a data drove method based on at least one of the measurements of love most utilized in literature (contained variables); and identify correlations between such metrics and relational variables, such equally satisfaction and elapsing (dependent variables). Graham applied an inter-metric model of correlation that allowed to record common characteristics. Well-nigh of the 22 research papers apply a cross-sectional pattern and a quantitative arroyo. The inquiry projects have been conducted in diverse dissimilar countries and cultures, and especially involved the white-Caucasian ethnic group or, in some cases, other ethnicities but every bit a small percentage of the sample [20] [24] [25]. The just exception was the sample considered in the research past Smith and Klases [26], including 56 participants from the UK (London) and 52 from Hong Kong. Moreover, we plant 2 studies focused on the Islamic population [27] [28] and others presenting a comparing betwixt dissimilar cultures [25] [29].

The sample size ranged from 12 to 1582 participants. The latter were mostly unmarried university students, though sure researches included married individuals [24] [30] or individuals in a committed dear human relationship [30] [31] [32]. The only ii studies that considered (heterosexual) couples likewise as the percentage of couples with children are that carried out by Gana et al. [23] and Vedes et al. [33]. Certain studies [34] [35] have considered clinical samples (patients suffering pathological love and jealousy), or partners that have experienced special situations such as cheating [36]. The samples included both females and males; only Honari and Saremi [37] have taken into consideration a female-merely pool. The average age varied and the age range in most cases was quite broad. For example, in the research conducted past Lin & Huddleston-Casas [30] the range was 19 to 91 years. Where specified, participants mostly belonged to the middle class [20] [33].

Sampling was generally performed on a voluntary basis, though some authors used random sampling [24] [28]. Although almost studies involved persons attending bookish institutions such every bit universities, in certain cases participants were involved by means of advertisement, postings, e-mail, and other methods [24] [30] [33] [34].

Generally speaking, consent to take part in the research was requested to participants, while in sure studies it was besides obtained from the institutions [29] [34].

Most of the inquiry projects used standardized instruments, at times translated in the language spoken in the country where the research was conducted, then validated [29] and administered individually. In measuring dearest styles, a broadly used metric is the Love Attitudes Scale Brusk-Grade (LAS-SF) [38]. Certain studies also adopt measurements designed ad hoc, peculiarly for the assessment of relational dimensions [39], and a single study used the telephone interview method [30]. The nigh of import information near these aspects are synthetized in Tabular array 2.

three.ii. Summary of Data Nowadays in the Enquiry Projects Reviewed

We take classified the results extrapolated from the researches in accordance with the six dearest styles identified past Lee [1]. This approach allowed us to organize content in relation to the correlations and influence that the different dear styles may have on the health and well-being of a dearest human relationship. At the same fourth dimension, it allowed united states of america to quote the reviewed manufactures more than than in one case in case they dealt with more than one love manner.

Tabular array 2. Topic, objectives and methodological characteristics of the reviewed inquiry projects.

Eros love style and its relational correlates

This mode expresses romantic love―distinguished by passion as well equally physical and emotional attraction―is widely correlated to a high intensity of the beloved feeling, quality of life, and subjective well-being [40], as well as salubrious love [34], and the various works analysed announced to confirm its positive value. In fact, it appears to exist related to the practiced qualities of a relationship and of married life [28], as well every bit dyadic satisfaction [nine] [20] [29] [33] [41]. The positive correlations are stable and exercise not change over time, in that they exist both in short and long-term relationships [seven] [9] and in all age groups [41], nor do they mutate in different cultures, as recorded by Galinha et al. [29] who made a comparison between Americans, Mozambicans, and Europeans (Portugal). The positivity of the Eros love style is further attested by the results of researches that accept proven its direct associations with specific dimensions, such as attachment security [29], the want for intimate closeness to the partner [31], positive strategies for conflict resolution such as compromise [25], and dyadic coping, namely the joint endeavor by both partners to face a stressful situation lived by ane of the two [33]. Besides, this love style is correlated to commitment in a relationship [xx] expressed past a couple, which has expectations in terms of its elapsing, coherently with a romantic conception of love, as proved past the presence of negative emotions upon determination of the relationship [39]. Karandashev et al. [42] have recorded that in the initial stage of the relationship, Eros causes a decrease in avoidance, and feet diminishes, as function a dimension of the couple's bonding procedure. As a further proof that the dear fashion is positive, certain results highlight inverse proportionality betwixt Eros and relational behaviour such as avoidance [32] or destructive communication behaviour―as identified by Gottman―including contempt, criticism, and defence [24], and with dysfunctional coping strategies such as interactional impulsiveness and dominance [25]. Moreover, Couch et al. [36] have recorded that Eros does non seem to correlate with the dysfunctional emotional reactions that couples often expressed in disquisitional situations, such every bit emotional infidelity of the partner.

In a study by Galinha et al. [29], Eros appears to also have a mediation function betwixt attachment and subjective well-beingness, at least in Mozambican and Portuguese participants―though not in American participants. This result suggests that a combination of secure attachment and Eros contributes in greater measure to subjective well-being in collectivist cultures―such equally Mozambican and Portuguese cultures―as opposed to individualist cultures such equally the American culture.

Despite the positive value Eros fashion in relationships is broadly confirmed, we have recorded a serial of discrepant opinions. While Kimberly and Werner-Wilson [24] have observed a moderate correlation between Eros and dyadic coping, degree of analogousness, and relational satisfaction, Adil and Kamal [27] recorded zero correlation with secure attachment and, instead, an existing correlation with the attachment way defined past Bartholomew and Horowitz [43] as "preoccupied" (preoccupied attachment manner, distinguished past a negative perception of one'south self and others), though only in males. Goodboy and Myers [32] observed, instead, that Eros may exist in partners adopting negative relational behaviour, such as spying on the partner; the scholars argue that such behaviour may be adopted as a possible confirmation that the love relationship is experienced intensely and passionately. Ortalda and Clapetto [twoscore] reported that Eros may fifty-fifty be correlated to feelings of jealousy. Smith and Klases [26] have observed that the length of a relationship is a significant predictor of the Eros style, but in a negative sense: the longer the relationships final, the less individuals bear witness the love style. In the only reviewed research in which the scholars analyzed marital couples with the histrion?partner interdependence model, some differences betwixt husband and wife were observed. In fact, while a passionate mental attitude toward honey of a couple'south partners influenced their own marital satisfaction (albeit to a bottom extent in the husbands) (actor effect), only the wife'due south Eros style had a significant effect on her partner'southward marital satisfaction (partner effect).

Agape dear manner and its relational correlates

Distinguished past altruistic attitudes and behaviour expressed past people that are most interested in providing support, care, and respect to the partner, this beloved manner is positively correlated to human relationship quality [28], length of the relationship [26], and relational satisfaction [30] [33] [41], regardless of the level of instruction, religiousness, or gender [30]. Moreover, this type of partner: always tends towards a more than secure attachment [42] ; considers commitment an important characteristic in choosing a partner [39] ; tends towards fugitive destructive communication behaviour―such as that identified by Gottman, including contempt, criticism, and defense [24] ―and negative strategies for disharmonize resolution, such as dominance, but―on the other paw―uses positive modes such as compromise [25]. As recorded by Vedes et al. [33], a loftier level of Agape facilitates back up to a stressed partner, and the joint effort to avoid stressors, although the latter coping type seems to be rarer in couples who accept been together for longer. Furthermore, couples adopting such love type practise non seem to show negative relational behaviour, such equally jealousy or spying [32]. Couch et al. [36] have recorded that Agape couples tend to not show dysfunctional reactions after having been cheated on by a partner. Nonetheless, when a relationship ends Afraid males in detail study that they feel negative emotions [39].

As for Eros, results that are partially contradictory with the bulk of enquiry―which emphasizes its positivity―have been recorded. For example, Agape is recorded to not exist correlated to attachment security [27], but rather to an anxious dimension of zipper [26] and pathological honey [34].

Moreover, in terms of the connectedness between Agape style and relational satisfaction, Fehr et al. [20] observed it does non be, Vedes et al. [33] institute a greater presence in women, and Kimberly and Werner-Wilson [24] found a greater presence in men. This concluding result has been confirmed also in the enquiry of Gana et al. [23] who used the player-partner interdependence model. In fact, they observed only the upshot of a married man'south Agape style on his ain marital satisfaction (actor event). Neither significant result regarding the effect of a wife'southward agape way on her own bridal satisfaction (histrion effect) nor the upshot of each partner'due south Agape manner on the relational satisfaction of the other ane has been found.

Ludus dear way and its relational correlates

With its playful and uncommitted attitude towards love, and its inverse proportionality with the intensity of the dear sentiment [twoscore], this style is more often than not regarded as a risk gene for the quality and stability of the romantic relationship. Coherently with its theoretical definition, and in a couple's relationship pathway, the Ludus style appears to affect all evolution, maintenance, and dissolution phases, in terms of weak effort in the relationship, lack of treat one's commitment or that of one'southward partner, and positive feelings upon termination of the relationship [20] [39].

In the human relationship building phase Ludic people tend to desire a lack of closeness [31] and to mistrust one another from the very start, although they still show signs of desiring closeness, and bear witness fluctuations in avoidance [42]. At the same time, though generally experiencing relational dissatisfaction [29] [33] [41], ludic people make attempts to go on the relationship live, though they do so through negative behaviour such as subversive conflict, infidelity, avoidance, a and stimulation of jealousy in the other, equally well as spying [32].

Ludus is considered a expert predictor of behaviour triggering jealousy in the partner [32] [44] and destructive communicative behaviour such equally that identified past Gottman as The Iv Horsemen of the Apocalypse [24]. In conflict situations, Ludus couples tend to adopt―rather than constructive strategies such as compromise―destructive strategies, such every bit dominance and a greater impulsiveness in interactions [25]. Couch et al. [36] noted that when Ludus partners are cheated on, they do non manifest post-traumatic physical and psychological symptoms. Furthermore, Ludus is correlated to the avoidant form of attachment, as it is confirmed how partners with a playful attitude towards love tend to build adult insecure-avoidant attachment relationships [29].

Despite such clear and confirmed correlation between ludic behaviour and risk factors for the quality and duration of a relationship, sure research projects highlight gender differences and―as supported by Vedes et al. [33] ―hint how, notwithstanding today, the love fashion is more socially accustomed and considered more normal past and in men than in women. In fact, while in the view of Vedes et al. [33] relationship dissatisfaction is more frequent in ludic women rather than in men, Neto and Pinto [41] reported that adult men go equally far equally saying they are satisfied of their dear life, whilst the love mode appeared to be irrelevant in love satisfaction levels of immature adults and older adults. Also in terms of a correlation with the preoccupied attachment form, Adil and Kamal [27] observed information technology is straight proportional in men and inversely proportional in women.

Storge love way and its relational correlates

There is a lack of inquiry reporting meaning data apropos this love style, based upon friendship and spending time with one another. Information technology is considered a skillful predictor of married life quality [28] ; information technology is positively correlated with dyadic coping [24] and a progressive development of secure attachment [42] ; and in adults and older adults it is correlated with satisfaction in love life [41]. Moreover, it is associated to functional strategies to solve conjugal conflict―such as compromise―and is inversely related to dysfunctional strategies such as impulsiveness in interaction [25]. Couch et al. [36] reveal how there is no show that persons adopting this fashion, along with Eros, Pragma, and Agape, suffer negative consequences on the physical-psychological wellness following emotional infidelity past a partner.

While Galinha et al. [29] noted an absenteeism of association between relational satisfaction and secure attachment, in the meta-assay performed by Acevedo and Aron [vii] it was recorded that the style is moderately correlated with relational satisfaction, generally in long-term relationships rather than short-term relationships. It also appears to be a mutual style in long-term relationships, and when the relationships end, jealousy seems to be the master motivation [39]. On the other mitt, Smith and Klases [26] observed how the longer the relationship, the more than unlikely it is that partners show such friendly attitude in love.

Pragma love mode and its relational correlates

Typical of people who express a pragmatic and rational attitude towards dearest, and for this reason tend to choose the partner based upon the characteristics they believe are important to them [39], Pragma appears to be linked to stable relationships [40], partially to the quality of married life [28], and to satisfaction in the relationship past adults and older adults [41]. Information technology also contributes to the subjective well-being of people [29]. In conflict situations, pragmatic people generally apply strategies such every bit compromise and avoidance [25], and when they endure emotional infidelity by their partner, they exercise non have strong reactions [36]. Partners with this manner do not appear to build an "anxious", fearful attachment mode―distinguished by a negative perception of 1'southward self and others, co-ordinate to the typology identified past Bartholomew and Horowitz [27] ―just instead show uncertainty and fluctuations in the formation of an emotional zipper [42]. Galinha et al. [29] have non recorded whatever influence of this love style on secure attachment and on perception of the relational satisfaction of the partner.

Mania love style and its relational correlates

Mania is the expression of a manic attitude towards love, implying possessive and obsessive behaviours: information technology is considered the purest form of romantic obsession [7] [9]. It is perhaps due to such characteristic that it is considered and consolidated as an of import gamble factor in quality of married life. Despite it involves people that tend to commit to the relationship [20], such people practice not appear to be able to build long-term relationships [26] or satisfying relationships [vii], with a few exceptions. In fact, Neto & Pinto [41] recorded a correlation between love life satisfaction in manic male adults, just non females. Mania is a strong predictor of negative relational behaviour. Information technology is correlated to jealousy [forty] and exists in people expressing pathological jealousy [35] and pathological love [34] [35], and that tend to manifest jealousy-evoking behaviour in the partner, even when they are shown amore by the latter [44]. Partners adopting a manic beloved style tend to express an excessive need to be reassured by the partner [44], emotional highs and lows in the ability to exist shut to him/her [42], an anxious-ambivalent attachment style [37], and preoccupation for the relation and its termination [39]. On the other hand, Smith and Klases [26] recorded an changed proportionality with the anxious component of zipper. Manic people tend to exercise negative relational behaviour to go along the relationship alive, such every bit destructive conflict, infidelity, allowing command and spying [32]. In their cultural analysis, Galinha et al. [29] revealed how Mania is inversely proportional to secure attachment in their Mozambican sample, merely not in the American or Portuguese participants.

Information technology is directly proportional to destructive communication behaviour such as that identified by Gottman [24], and is the main predictor of negative reactions following infidelity by a partner, in that people adopting this style tend to: alive adultery in a traumatic way, express unresolved feelings related to the outcome experienced, and suffer physical symptoms, acute stress, unease, feet, depression, and struggle to forgive [36].

4. Give-and-take

The results of the researches and studies considered in this review let us to formulate an initial, though full general, argument related to the importance of love and the various behaviours information technology is expressed with that affect quality and duration of a human relationship. It is thus also a topic relevant to the field of psychology, and not but a thing for writers, artists, and poets. In the very conceptualization of love, aspects such as happiness, satisfaction, intimacy, passion, and commitment are central dimensions. It is sufficient to recollect the Triangular Theory of Dearest by Sternberg and the numerous research projects referencing information technology and highlighting how the components identified past the scholar take a considerable importance for the relational satisfaction of partners [2] [45]. Furthermore, Fricker & Moore [46] claimed that love styles themselves branch from the adult attachment theory, and thus a clearer comprehension of relational satisfaction may be obtained by combining the two perspectives.

This review also appears to confirm the variability of ways to live honey and, in item, that love styles seem to be separate from ane another, and each provides dissimilar information on the quality and duration of a relationship, though a clear and linear model of correlation has not emerged to this day. This leads usa to believe that there exists a complex articulation of love and relational variables. A significant example is provided in the research past Hammock & Richardson [39], which revealed different correlations between different love styles and variables in the relational phases: choosing a partner, maintenance, and termination of the human relationship. At the aforementioned fourth dimension, diverse researches underline how there continues to often be gender inequality in the ways and directions in which the correlations between love styles and relational dimensions manifest themselves. This makes the widespread estimation that men and women tend to express different attitudes towards love and love relationships more than problematic [xl] [47]. In this perspective, it is believed that women are more than oriented towards relationships and love, thus more influenced by love styles compared to men [33] [48]. A further source of complication is the life bicycle of a love relationship. In terms of love styles, the relational satisfaction bend seems to overcome the U-shape―as Vaillant and Vaillant [49] observed―and follows a varying proportionality to the life phases of a couple [seven] [ix].

Moreover, the research papers reviewed emphasize non only the distinction between love styles, only also the variability within each fashion as opposed to the dissimilar factors of human relationship quality. In fact, although the results of research and studies mostly agree in stating the importance of Eros, Agape, and Ludus in the quality of a love relationship―a positive effect in the start two cases (as factors of protection and resources) and a negative event in the 3rd instance (as a factor of adventure and vulnerability)―there is in any instance a certain degree of variation and contradiction in the results recorded for the different styles. For instance, while near the entire pool of inquiry projects records a correlation between Eros and positive characteristics of a relationship, sure other cases highlighted a correlation with negative behaviour in the relationship maintenance stage, such as spying on the partner [32], and―in males―with preoccupied attachment style [27].

Despite the development we may record in terms of interest for research on dear styles and types, as well as their furnishings on well-beingness, personal and relationship health, there nonetheless remain a number of matters to deal with, which the articles reviewed agree to mainly exist the method-related aspects. We have indeed recorded how the majority of projects use convenience sampling but―although this method is advisable in certain circumstances, specially in exploratory research performed to generate new ideas―as stated by Lin and Huddleston-Casas [30], it is necessary to too implement random sampling in gild to know and generalize the results. Moreover, the samples were more often than not composed of students, and thus―as stated by Neto and Pinto [41] ―were not representative of the wider population of people involved in love relationships. In improver to this, the samples more often than not comprised individuals and not couples. This prevented from recording what really occurs in a relationship, and thus the possibility of performing a dyadic cess, which is a method gathering wide attention in the field of research on relationship quality [fifty] [51] [52] [53]. In fact, a number of studies highlights the possibility of a reciprocal influence betwixt partners, likewise in terms of the mental attitude towards dear [54]. Using a dyadic approach, for some of love styles (as Eros and Agape) the reviewed research of Gana et al. [23] showed hubby-wife non-independence in marital satisfaction. Therefore, acknowledging how the dearest approach of a partner influences not merely his/her perception, behaviour, attitude, and feelings towards the relationship, but even those of the partner, is a particularly interesting goal in the study of dearest. Indeed, upon a systemic arroyo, it may be stated that the influence one may accept on his/her personal and relational health and well-beingness does non only depend on one's own way of being, but also that of the partner.

Another element of vulnerability is the utilize of cross-exclusive research design, which is widely used just still limits the possibility of generalizing results and to make inferential conclusions. Therefore, while information technology is hands presumed that beloved styles belong to a person earlier he/she gets involved in a beloved human relationship, at the moment bidirectional or fifty-fifty opposite furnishings may not be ruled out. Thus, future research shall focus more on a longitudinal pattern in order to observe the path of love styles [13]. Besides, longitudinal studies may likewise represent a useful assay of the transformations of love and the related attitudes and behaviour throughout the couple's relationship life. In the review, information technology emerges that in that location are authors who report the demand to distinguish short-term and long-term relationships in an cess of the furnishings of love (see, for instance, the meta-analysis by Acevedo & Aron, [7]. Clearly, to consider the development of a relationship also implies an assessment of the dissimilar dimensions and aspects that may exist in a couple's relational life, such as the existence of parenthood or not. There is a true lack of research on love styles in the latter scope; this is further attested by the fact that, on the other paw, in research apropos relationship quality it is widely documented how the presence of sons may go a risk cistron [55] [56] [57].

Moreover, the papers taken into account in this review use self-study tools, which information technology would be necessary to pair with other techniques such as ascertainment, qualitative interviews, and neuroimaging. This would allow to obtain a more detailed motion picture of phenomena, such as love, which have circuitous and multidimensional characteristics, equally indeed underlined by Graham [9] upon conclusion of his meta-analysis. This broad and integrated assessment of different techniques may even exist especially useful in the evaluation of sentimental relationships and―as observed in the by past Weiss [58] ―may imply a bias related to the tendency to detect relational aspects positively when people are happy and satisfied of their marital life.

5. Conclusions

Although our review allows to accept an idea of the state-of-the-fine art of cognition and criticalities apropos this topic, and to offer indications for further enquiry and its practical implications, information technology is nevertheless wise to continue into account sure limits of this study. First of all, it must be considered that the review was conducted past limiting the selection to contributions published on peer-review journals in Italian and English. Moreover, there was a focus on relational aspects and dimensions that shall be in any instance not dissociated with personal, social, and cultural variables, which are likewise widely analysed in literature on dearest styles. Furthermore, we carried out a systems enquiry rather a meta-analysis―which is mostly considered more accurate in gaining noesis on given phenomena. This choice was due to the fact that the empirical research on love styles―though expressing interest in a deeper analysis of the topic―are nonetheless not sufficiently abundant then as to allow a reliable inference on their importance and effects, in order to encompass the relationship dynamics and thus intervene on relational wellness and well-being in the different contexts. A further limit is the fact that what we present is a narrative synthesis, subject field as such to the arbitrary estimation of the authors.

Nonetheless, the review widely highlights the relevance of the topic in the cess of relationship health. Further developments on the cognition of this field, with broad-spectrum studies and researches that may take into account the complexity of the phenomenon and its peculiarities are therefore desirable. Among these, the most relevant seem to be the mechanisms in couple matching, in that love and its approaches primarily find expression in a sentimental relationship. Besides, information technology is in fact the complexity of the aspects and mechanisms highlighted that suggests the opportunity to reflect upon the suitability and exhaustiveness of a categorization of dearest in mutually nullifying honey styles and types, in guild to investigate a possible natural dimension of the structure.

Further in-depth analyses may even accept interesting implications on the praxis, both in terms of assessment and in terms of preventive action. Hendrick [59] affirms the importance of an assessment of love styles in patients dealing with relationship bug. Cognition of beloved styles, as asserted past Ortalda and Clapetto [40], may permit an identification of the specific love way related to well-existence or to unease or struggle, thus aiding the diagnostic phase in a clinical intervention. Information technology is peculiarly the identification of the polysemy of honey and the different furnishings that living such sentiment may have on a relationship that―as claimed past Neff and Karney [60] ―may directly the focus not then much on the question of if and how much partners love each other, merely how they dear each other. Moreover, considering the importance of a dyadic assessment of issues in a couple, knowledge of the combination of love styles in partners may assist understand such criticalities. Think of a couple in which the husband is businesslike (Pragma) and the wife is romantic and passionate (Eros): the male person analyses the relationship condition and that which the wife can offer, while the female loves to let herself go without whatever adding; such couple may be at risk. Even the clinical intervention should exist addressed towards the distinguishing traits of the dear styles existing in couples that are dysfunctional, alien, or in a crisis. Literature includes a number of experiences that may aid sympathise how to address a clinical intervention focused on love. Even Yatim, Jusoh, Saper and Mukti [61] observed how the Agape love style is central to counselling, and discussed its implementation in a blazon of professional person intervention that it is named subsequently (Agape Dearest Counselling).

In determination, the enquiry significance on beloved, and in detail on beloved styles, is associated specially with the knowledge nearly the couple relationships and their functionality. In fact, the information that we tin obtain from the assay of this topic permits to enrich the range of hazard and protective factors of marital quality and stability. Besides, the practical significance of these studies concerns mainly the attainment of the awareness most the relevance of dear in the prevention and therapy of relation dysfunctionality.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of involvement.

References

[1]	Lee, J.A. (1973) The Colors of Love: An Exploration of the Ways of Loving. New Printing, Ontario.
[2]	Hoesni, S.Thousand., Subhi, N., Alavi, K. and Wan Azreena, Westward.J. (2013) Exploring Dear and Marital Satisfaction among Married Malay Males. Pertanika Periodical of Social Science and Humanities, 21, 59-68.
[3]	Fletcher, G.J.O., Simpson, J.A., Campbell, L. and Overall, Due north.C. (2015) Pair-Bonding, Romantic Love, and Evolution: The Curious Case of Homo Sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683
[4]	Kansky, J. (2018) What'due south Love Got to Do with It? Romantic Relationships and Well-Existence. In: Diener, E., Oishi, S. and Tay, L., Eds., Handbook of Well-Being, DEF Publishers, Salt Lake City, UT, 1-24.
[5]	O'Leary, K.D., Acevedo, B.P., Aron, A., Huddy, L. and Mashek, D. (2012) Is Long-Term Love More a Rare Miracle? If So, What Are Its Correlates? Social Psychological and Personality Science, iii, 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611417015
[6]	Dush, C.K.K. and Amato, P.R. (2005) Consequences of Relationship Status and Quality for Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056438
[7]	Acevedo, B.P. and Aron, A. (2009) Does a Long-Term Relationship Kill Romantic Love? Review of General Psychology, 13, 59-65. https://doi.org/ten.1037/a0014226
[8]	Doron, One thousand., Derby, D.S., Szepsenwol, O. and Talmor, D. (2012) Tainted Love: Exploring Relationship-Centered Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Ii Non-Clinical Cohorts. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2011.eleven.002
[ix]	Graham, J.Grand. (2011) Measuring Honey in Romantic Relationships: A Meta-Assay. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 748-771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510389126
[x]	Reynaud, M., Karila, L., Blecha, L. and Benyamina, A. (2010) Is Love Passion an Addictive Disorder? The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36, 261-267. https://doi.org/ten.3109/00952990.2010.495183
[11]	Fisher, H.E. (2014) The Tyranny of Love. Love Addiction—An Anthropologist's View. In: Rosenberg, K.P. and Feder, L.C., Eds., Behavioral Addictions. Criteria, Evidence, and Handling, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 237-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407724-nine.00010-0
[12]	Fisher, E.E., Xu, 10., Aron, A. and Dark-brown, L.L. (2016) Intense, Passionate, Romantic love: A Natural Addiction? How the Fields That Investigate Romance and Substance Abuse Can Inform Each Other. Frontiers in Psychology, vii, Article 687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00687
[13]	Berscheid, E. (2010) Dear in the Time. Almanac Review of Psychology, 61, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100318
[xiv]	Underwood, L.Yard. (2009) Compassionate Dearest: A Framework for Research. In: Fehr, B., Sprecher, S., and Underwood, L.G., Eds., The Science of Empathetic Love: Theory, Research, and Applications, Wiley-Blackwell, W Sussex, U.k., iii-25.
[15]	Berscheid, E. and Walster, E. (1978) Interpersonal Attraction. 2d Edition, Addison Wesley Reading, MA.
[sixteen]	Collins, N.L., Kane, H.S., Metz, 1000.A., Cleveland, C., Khan, C., Winczewski, L., Bowen, J. and Prok, T., (2014) Psychological, Physiological, and Behavioral Responses to a Partner in Need: The Office of Compassionate Honey. Periodical of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 601-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514529069
[17]	Hendrick, C. and Hendrick, S. (1986) A Theory and Method of Love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392
[18]	Agus, Yard., Puddu, 50., Gonnelli, C. and Raffagnino, R. (2018) Honey Attitudes Scale-Short Form: The Preliminary Assessment of the Factor Structure of Its Italian Version. Applied Psychology Bulletin, 66, 15-31.
[19]	Lomas, T. (2018) The Flavours of Honey: A Cross-Cultural Lexical Analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12158
[20]	Fehr, B., Harasymchuk, C. and Sprecher, S. (2014) Empathetic Beloved in Romantic Relationships: A Review and Some New Findings. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 575-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514533768
[21]	Neto, F. (2012) Compassionate Love for a Romantic Partner, Love Styles and Subjective Well-Being. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, six, 23-39. https://doi.org/ten.5964/ijpr.v6i1.88
[22]	Masuda, M. (2003) Meta-Analyses of Love Scales: Do Various Love Scales Measure the Aforementioned Psychological Constructs? Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5884.00030
[23]	Gana, G., Saada, Y. and Untas, A. (2013) Effects of Love Styles on Marital Satisfaction in Heterosexual Couples: A Dyadic Approach. Matrimony & Family Review, 49, 754-772. https://doi.org/ten.1080/01494929.2013.834025
[24]	Kimberly, C. and Werner-Wilson, R. (2013) From John Lee to John Gottman: Recognizing Intra- and Interpersonal Differences to Promote Marital Satisfaction. Periodical of Human Sciences and Extension, one, 32-46.
[25]	Zacchilli, T.L., Hendrick, C. and Hendrick, Due south.South. (2009) The Romantic Partner Conflict Scale: A New Scale to Measure Relationship Conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1073-1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347936
[26]	Smith, R. and Klases, A. (2016) Predictors of Love Attitudes: The Contribution of Cultural Orientation, Gender Attachment Style, Human relationship Length and Age in Participants from the Uk and Hong Kong. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 10, 90-108. https://doi.org/x.5964/ijpr.v10i1.204
[27]	Adil, A. and Kamal, A. (2005) Relationship between Dearest Styles, Attachment Styles, and Narcissism among University Student. Indian Psychological Review, 64, 33-52.
[28]	Zadeh, South.S. and Bozorgi, Z.D. (2016) Human relationship between the Love Styles, Personality Traits, and the Marital Life of Married Students. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 746-756.
[29]	Galinha, I.C., Oishi, Due south., Pereira, C.R., Wirtz, D. and Esteves, F. (2014) Adult Attachment, Love Styles, Human relationship Experiences and Subjective Well-Beingness: Cross-Cultural and Gender Comparison between Americans, Portuguese, and Mozambicans. Social Indicators Research, 119, 823-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0512-7
[30]	Lin, L. and Huddleston-Casas, C.A. (2005) Afraid Beloved in Couple Relationships. Spousal relationship & Family unit Review, 37, 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v37n04_03
[31]	Goodboy, A.K. and Berth-Butterfield, G. (2009) Dearest Styles and Want for Closeness in Romantic Relationships. Psychological Reports, 105, 191-197. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.1.191-197
[32]	Goodboy, A.M. and Myers, South.A. (2010) Relational Quality Indicators and Love Styles as Predictors of Negative Relational Maintenance Behaviors in Romantic Relationships. Communication Reports, 23, 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2010.511397
[33]	Vedes, A., Hilpert, P., Nussbeck, F.W., Randall, A.One thousand., Bodenmann, 1000. and Lind W.R. (2016) Dear Styles, Coping, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Dyadic Arroyo. Personal Relationships, 23, 84-97. https://doi.org/x.1111/pere.12112
[34]	Sophia, E.C., Tavares, H., Berti, 1000.P., Pereira, A.P., Lorena, A., Mello, C., Gorenstein, C. and Zilberman, Chiliad.Fifty. (2009) Pathological Love: Impulsivity, Personality, and Romantic Relationship. CNS Spectrums, 14, 268-274. https://doi.org/ten.1017/S1092852900025438
[35]	Stravogiannis, A.L.D.C., Kim, H.S., Sophia, E.C., Sanches, C., Zilberman, 1000.L. and Tavares, H. (2018) Pathological Jealousy and Pathological Love: Apples to Apples or Apples to Oranges? Psychiatry Research, 259, 562-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.029
[36]	Couch, L.50., Baughman, K.R. and Derow, M.R. (2017) The Aftermath of Romantic Betrayal: What's Love Got to Exercise with Information technology? Current Psychology, 36, 504-515. https://doi.org/ten.1007/s12144-016-9438-y
[37]	Honari, B. and Saremi, A.A. (2015) The Study of Relationship between Attachment Styles and Obsessive Dearest Style. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 165, 152-159. http://Creativecommons.Org/Licenses/By-Nc-Nd/iii.0/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.617
[38]	Hendrick, C., Hendrick, Southward. and Dicke, A. (1998) The Love Attitudes Calibration: Short Grade. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, fifteen, 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598152001
[39]	Hammock, 1000. and Richardson, D.S. (2011) Love Attitudes and Relationship Experience. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 608-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.522618
[40]	Ortalda, F. and Clapetto, South.C. (2010) Amore e benessere soggettivo: Una ricerca esplorativa. Psicologia della Salute, 2, 59-72.
[41]	Neto, F. and Pinto, M. da C. (2015) Satisfaction with Love Life beyond the Adult Life Span. Practical Research Quality Life, x, 289-304. https://doi.org/ten.1007/s11482-014-9314-six
[42]	Karandashev, V., Benton, M., Edwards, C. and Wolters, Five. (2012) Development of Attachment in Romantic Relationship of Young Adults with Different Dear Styles. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 6, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v6i1.87
[43]	Bartholomew, Yard. and Horowitz, Fifty.M. (1991) Attachment Styles among Young Adults: A Examination of a Four-Category Model. Periodical of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244. https://doi.org/ten.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
[44]	Goodboy, A.K., Horan, S.1000. and Berth-Butterfield, M. (2012) Intentional Jealousy-Evoking Behavior in Romantic Relationships as a Office of Received Partner Affection and Love Styles. Advice Quarterly, 60, 370-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.688792
[45]	de Andrade, A.L., Wachelke, J.F.R. and Howat-Rodrigues, A.B.C. (2015) Relationship Satisfaction in Young Adults: Gender and Beloved Dimensions. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, nine, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v9i1.157
[46]	Fricker, J. and Moore, S. (2002) Human relationship Satisfaction: The Role of Love Styles and Attachment Styles. Electric current Research in Social Psychology, seven, 1-16.
[47]	Regan, P.C. (2016) Loving Unconditionally: Demographic Correlates of the Agapic Love Style. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 10, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v10i1.199
[48]	Hendrick, Southward.South., Hendrick, C. and Adler, N.Fifty. (1988) Romantic Relationships: Dearest, Satisfaction, and Staying Together. Periodical of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980-988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.half-dozen.980
[49]	Vaillant, C.O. and Vaillant, G.E. (1993) Is the U-Curve of Marital Satisfaction an Illusion? A 40-Twelvemonth Report of Marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 230-239. https://doi.org/ten.2307/352971
[fifty]	Bouchard, M. (2018) A Dyadic Examination of Marital Quality at the Empty-Nest Phase. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 86, 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415017691285
[51]	Durtschi, J.A., Fincham, F.D., Cui, M., Lorenz, F.O. and Conger, R.D. (2011) Dyadic Processes in Early Spousal relationship: Attributions, Behavior, and Marital Quality. Family Relations, 60, 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00655.x
[52]	Landis, M., Peter-Wight, M., Martin 1000. and Bodenmann, One thousand. (2013) Dyadic Coping and Marital Satisfaction of Older Spouses in Long-Term Marriage. The Periodical of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 26, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000077
[53]	Papp, 50.M. and Witt, N.L. (2010) Romantic Partners' Private Coping Strategies and Dyadic Coping: Implications for Human relationship Functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 551-559. https://doi.org/x.1037/a0020836
[54]	Reis, H.T., Maniaci, G.R. and Rogge, R.D. (2013) The Expression of Compassionate Honey in Everyday Empathetic Acts. Periodical of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 651-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513507214
[55]	Kwok, South.Y., Cheng, L., Chow, B.W. and Ling, C.C. (2015) The Spillover Effect of Parenting on Marital Satisfaction among Chinese Mothers. Journal of Kid and Family unit Studies, 24, 772-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9888-10
[56]	Schieman, Due south., Ruppanne, L. and Milkie, M.A. (2018) Who Helps with Homework? Parenting Inequality and Relationship Quality amongst Employed Mothers and Fathers. Journal of Family and Economical Issues, 39, 49-65. https://doi.org/ten.1007/s10834-017-9545-four
[57]	Shapiro, D. (2014) Stepparents and Parenting Stress: The Roles of Gender, Marital Quality, and Views about Gender Roles. Family Procedure, 53, 97-108. https://doi.org/x.1111/famp.12062
[58]	Weiss, R.L. (1980) Strategic Behavioral Marital Therapy: Toward a Model for Assessment and Intervention, Vol. 1. In: Vincent, J.P., Ed., Advances in Family unit Intervention, Assessment and Theory, JAI Press, Greenwich, 229-271.
[59]	Hendrick, S. (2004) Close Relationships Enquiry: A Resources for Couple and Family Therapists. Periodical of Marital and Family unit Therapy, 30, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01219.ten
[60]	Neff, L.A. and Karney, B.R. (2009) Compassionate Love in Early Wedlock. In: Fehr, B., Sprecher, Southward. and Underwood, L., Eds., The Science of Compassionate Love: Theory, Research, and Application, Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, 201-222.
[61]	Yatim, A.Chiliad, Jusoh, A.J., Saper, N. and Mukti, T.A. (2015) Agape Love Counseling Module. The International Journal of Social Science, 37, 128-132.

nielsonlited1940.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=89616

Share this post